EVE Search - Supercaps, Caps, Drones and Fighters, a New Zulupark Blog

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE Information Portal

Supercaps, Caps, Drones and Fighters, a New Zulupark Blog

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 9 post(s)
Law Enforcer	Posted - 2007.10.21 11:18:00 - [1] just increase the cost of a carrier/mom if you want less people to be flying around in them. nerfing them to five fighters is just a bad idea. what happens if the support fleet gets wiped out and you have four/six battleships on you and you KNOW you could have killed them. but you magically cannot control more then five fighters even though a carrier should have the logistic capabilities to run an entire city because ccp says so. it defeats the role of a carrier. a carrier is a platform to launch and control all of its fighters and if it can't do that you better rename them to something else.
Law Enforcer	Posted - 2007.10.21 14:58:00 - [2] Originally by: Serena Ku Originally by: Empire marketslave how would you like it if you spend about 2 bilion or 20 bil on a ship that you enjoyed using and ccp said sorry we are gonna change it so that your weapons only work when you are in a gang. oh and a 200k ship can pin you down so you cant do anything but wait for the boom The pilot flying that 200k ship is paying exactly the same to CCP as you are. And it's not like he can kill you by himself and you cannot fit energy neuts. If he has a big fleet helping him and you don't you deserve to lose your ship. you know you need to fire your "balancing" department when a 200k ship can pin down a 2/24billion isk CAPITAL ship. why don't I go get in my tug boat and try to down the US Enterprise and see how far I get.
Law Enforcer	Posted - 2007.10.21 19:44:00 - [3] this idea deserves the title "epic fail".
Law Enforcer	Posted - 2007.10.23 18:54:00 - [4] Originally by: CCP Zulupark Originally by: Kerfira Edited by: Kerfira on 23/10/2007 16:07:29 Edited by: Kerfira on 23/10/2007 16:06:03 Originally by: CCP Zulupark We are still monitoring this thread and reading the ~~ideas~~ posts we agree with that come up in it. We will, as previously stated, keep you up to date on ~~any kind of progress~~ when we implement this. Corrected this for you. Eris made that fact plain for all to see..... "Cleverly" changing my post to make some point I'm not quite sure of what is will not change the fact that we are still monitoring this thread and listening to all ideas/complaints you have. bullcrap. that's why after 86? pages of people screaming NO this garbage went to the test server. you really listen to us.
Law Enforcer	Posted - 2007.10.23 19:14:00 - [5] Originally by: Lowbridge Why are you doing this to paying players that have spent the better part of 1 1/2 years training for this ship to totaly change how this ship is used in the game. Please think this through completely before you move forward with this change because a noob should be able to kill you with all his noob friends and when a group of noobies can't kill you then said ship you're flying must be unbalanced and in need of a nerf.
Law Enforcer	Posted - 2007.10.23 19:19:00 - [6] I'm so glad I never trained carriers.
Law Enforcer	Posted - 2007.10.23 21:16:00 - [7] Originally by: Kerfira Edited by: Kerfira on 23/10/2007 21:14:28 Originally by: CCP Abathur Update - We've been working hard to address your concerns. There will be a new dev blog up very soon which should hopefully clarify things a bit. Hang in there, guys and gals. You've already said that. We didn't believe you then..... Translation: "We're still going ahead with this. We just need time to sugarcoat it...." How hard is it to write "We're not going to do this!" as a reply instead of writing posts without content as this one? I agree. a "we're going to go ahead and do this despite your nearly 100 page protest" dev blog is coming soon. you'll be able to launch five fighters and stuff! it's teh greats.
Law Enforcer	Posted - 2007.10.23 21:21:00 - [8] Originally by: CCP Abathur Update - We've been working hard to address your concerns although for the greater good carriers are still being nerfed. There will be a new dev blog up very soon which should hopefully clarify things a bit. Hang in there, guys and gals. edited to reflect what's really going to happen.
Law Enforcer	Posted - 2007.10.23 22:26:00 - [9] CCP Gangleri > This is the first iteration.. just like the fighter change... and everything that is on Sisi. it looks like the fighter change is going ahead as planned.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.